Chemosensory disorder trigger and management system

ABSTRACT

A system for chemosensory disorder testing includes a scanner for scanning a unique identifier associated with a test subject. A scent dispensing unit dispenses a predetermined scent for the test subject responsive to receipt of a dispensing control signal. A user interface receives a test response input from the test subject based on a perception of the test subject of the predetermined scent dispensed by the scent dispensing unit. A central controller generates the dispensing control signal responsive to the unique identifier scanned by the scanner. The central controller further determines at least one of a pass test result or a fail test result responsive to a comparison of the test response input to a predetermined response associated with the predetermined scent. A relational database stores the pass test result or the fail test result at a location associated with the unique identifier associated with the test subject.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.63/111,456, filed Nov. 9, 2020, entitled CHEMOSENSORY DISORDER TRIGGERAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, the specifications of which are incorporated byreference herein in their entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a system and method for testing forchemosensory disorders, and more particularly to self-test and stagedself-testing systems and methods for detecting chemosensory disorders.

BACKGROUND

Current screening processes for illnesses such as the flu or thecoronavirus have involved the taking of temperatures of an individualand questionnaires regarding the individuals contacts and behaviors.While these techniques can be somewhat effective, the need to detectpotential illnesses at an earlier point than they may show a temperatureor before they are aware of their actions that may have caused aninfection are necessary. One marker that has been shown to be useful indetecting onset of certain diseases has been a loss of smell on the partof an infected person. The symptom often appears before others and canprovide an early indication of infection or other potential medicalissues such as neurodegenerative disorders, Parkinson's disease,Alzheimer's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Thus, a system andmethod for detecting a loss of smell in an individual would be greatlybeneficial in a number of areas.

SUMMARY

The present invention, as disclosed and described herein, in one aspectthereof, comprise a system for chemosensory disorder testing including ascanner for scanning a unique identifier associated with a test subject.A scent dispensing unit dispenses a predetermined scent for the testsubject responsive to receipt of a dispensing control signal. A userinterface receives a test response input from the test subject based ona perception of the test subject of the predetermined scent dispensed bythe scent dispensing unit. A central controller generates the dispensingcontrol signal responsive to the unique identifier scanned by thescanner. The central controller further determines at least one of apass test result or a fail test result responsive to a comparison of thetest response input to a predetermined response associated with thepredetermined scent. A relational database stores the pass test resultor the fail test result at a location associated with the uniqueidentifier associated with the test subject.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding, reference is now made to thefollowing description taken in conjunction with the accompanyingDrawings in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a diagrammatic view of a user attempting to gainaccess to a venue and possessing tickets;

FIG. 2 illustrates a diagrammatic view of an access gate at which aticket containing a barcode is presented to an attendant;

FIG. 3 illustrates a diagrammatic view of a temperature scan of theuser;

FIG. 4 illustrates a diagrammatic view of the user sanitizing theirhands;

FIG. 5 illustrates a diagrammatic view of one embodiment wherein twodifferent antiseptic sprays are utilized, one for each hand;

FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate the two different antiseptic sprays indiagrammatic views;

FIG. 7 illustrates a diagrammatic view of the smell test;

FIG. 8 illustrates a diagrammatic view of a following test;

FIG. 9 illustrates a diagrammatic of an overall system in one disclosedembodiment;

FIG. 10 illustrates a perspective view of an example of a dispenser ofFIG. 9;

FIG. 11 illustrates one example of the detail of the dispenser of FIG.9;

FIG. 12 illustrates an alternate embodiment wherein the manifold of FIG.11 has two outputs;

FIG. 13 illustrates a flowchart for one disclosed embodiment of theoverall operation;

FIG. 14 illustrates a flowchart for an actuation process;

FIG. 15 illustrates a flowchart for an alternate actuation procedure;

FIG. 16 illustrates a flowchart depicting a higher level view of theoverall operation;

FIG. 17 illustrates two sequential displays that are presented to twodifferent individuals;

FIG. 18 displays a layout of a relational database; and

FIGS. 19 and 20 illustrate an alternate antiseptic compound dispenser.

FIG. 21 illustrates a staged approach for self-testing a sense of smellof an individual;

FIG. 22 illustrates a flow diagram for providing staged self-testing fora loss of a sense of smell of an individual;

FIG. 23 illustrates a flow diagram describing a process for generating acombined score for a smell test;

FIG. 24 illustrates various code identifiers that may be used withpackets containing a scented material;

FIG. 25 illustrates various mediums for containing a testing scent;

FIG. 26 illustrates various manners for packaging smell test mediums;

FIG. 27 illustrates a block diagram of a first embodiment of a systemutilizing packets for enabling individual self-testing for chemosensorydisorders;

FIG. 28 illustrates a block diagram of a second embodiment of a systemusing an automated spray dispenser for enabling individual self-testingfor chemosensory disorders;

FIG. 29 illustrates an automated dispenser with associated entrydisplay;

FIG. 30A illustrates a user self-test station using packets for atesting process;

FIG. 30B illustrates a more detailed block diagram of a packet dispensersystem;

FIG. 31 illustrates a series of testing stations within a line or socialdistancing path for testing for chemosensory disorders;

FIG. 32 illustrates a flow diagram of a process for performing stagedtesting of individuals in a line or social distancing path; and

FIG. 33 illustrates a test controller and relational database forproviding staged test results for individuals.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers are usedherein to designate like elements throughout, the various views andembodiments of chemosensory disorder trigger and management system areillustrated and described, and other possible embodiments are described.The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instancesthe drawings have been exaggerated and/or simplified in places forillustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art willappreciate the many possible applications and variations based on thefollowing examples of possible embodiments.

In the various disclosed embodiments, an individual desiring to gainaccess to any given venue or location is required to pass through sometype of screening point with one or more tickets, each having a uniqueand discrete ticket number or some type of code that uniquely identifiesthe individual possessing a ticket as having purchased the ability togain access. However, for health concerns, certain health screening maybe required in order to allow an individual to gain access to any venuewherein a large number of people may be gathered. It may be that thisaccess is for any other reason also. This health screening can beperformed at any level by person or a machine that can collect some typeof biometric data from the individual or a predetermined analyticpurpose, such as that associated with determining if an individual hassome type of virus. The biometric data that may be collected can be inany form, depending upon what biometric data provides the desiredinformation required by the analytic algorithm utilized by the operatoror machine.

Referring now to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a user 102 having twotickets 104 contained on their person, these tickets 104 having indiciadisposal surface thereof indicating some unique code that allows theuser 102 access to a particular venue or location. These tickets 104 areunique and, as such, uniquely identify the user. These tickets typicallycontain some type of barcode that, when scanned into a system,identifies these tickets as valid tickets to the venue and willtypically indicate a seat and row in the venue. There is a database atsome remote location (or at a local location) that contains informationidentifying the individual that purchased or obtained this particularticket, such that cross reference can be made if required. If necessary,this information can actually assist in locating this particularindividual within a large venue via the location information associatedwith that particular ticket.

Referring to FIG. 2, there is illustrated a diagrammatic view of theticket booth 202 through which individuals 204 must pass in order togain access. Each of the individuals 204 possesses a ticket 207 havingdisposed thereon a unique barcode 207′. An attendant 205 at the ticketbooth 202 has a scanning device 206 which, in this disclosed embodimentis a mobile phone with the display, that is operable to scan the ticket207, and the barcode 207′ in order to obtain an image 208 on the displayof the gain device 206. This is then transmitted to a central locationfor confirmation. This is the confirmation process that will bedisclosed hereinbelow. Once confirm, the individuals 204 are allowed togain access through an entry gate and complete the check-in process.

Referring now to FIG. 3, at this location or event, various screeningtechniques for viruses such as COVID-19 may be deployed. One such isdepicted as a temperature scanner 302 for scanning the forehead of theindividual 102. This is one biometric indicator of the presence of somepossible infection. This infection could, of course, result from aperson being positive for COVID 19 or any other infection, such as thecommon cold. However, this is merely a test that triggers other testsand is not necessarily indicative of an individual being positive forCOVID 19. Additional screening tests may be required and, as wedisclosed hereinbelow, these additional tests are tests that are veryspecific for COVID 19.

Referring to FIG. 4, there is illustrated diagrammatic view of a healthscreening program associated with a smell test for the detection of anindividual having anozmia as will be described in more detailhereinbelow. In this reading, one goal is to achieve a rapid anozmiascreen that can be deployed as part of a non-invasive screening measure.In this depicted embodiment, the individual's hands 402 are disposedunder a dispenser 403 of a reservoir 404 containing some type ofantiseptic compound. This can be a touchless system wherein a specifiedamount 406 of the compound stored in the reservoir 404 is dispensed ontothe hand or hands 402 of the individual. This specified amount 406 ofthe compound can be either an antiseptic spray or even a gel. Thedispenser can be a touchless dispenser is activated by the individual oran operator can be associated with the overall process and manuallyactivate the dispenser 403 to dispense the specified amount 406 of thecompound stored in the reservoir 404. An “odorant” is combined with theantiseptic spray within the reservoir 404.

Referring to FIGS. 6A and 6B, there illustrated details of the tworeservoirs 506 and 508. In one disclosed embodiment, it may be that thereservoir 506 contains no odorant and the other reservoir 508 contains aspecific odorant additive formulation. This odorant is used to exploithyposmia and anozmia in asymptomatic COVID 19 patients by using theseadded odorants. The basic compound can, and one environment, the ethanol(ethyl alcohol) or isopropyl alcohol (isopropanol or 2-propanol).Reservoir 506 will contain only this basic compound. Reservoir 508, onthe other hand, has added thereto any of the multiple University ofPennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) stimuli for smell (ofwhich there are approximately 40) or any relative combinations thereof.This UPSIT test is a test that is commercially available for smellidentification to test the function of an individual's olfactory system.The test is usually administered in a waiting room and takes only a fewminutes. The test consists of 4 different 10 page booklets, with a totalof 40 questions. On each page, there is a different “scratch and sniff”strip which are embedded with a micro encapsulated odorant. There isalso a 4 choice multiple-choice question on each page. The scents arereleased using a pencil. After each scent is released, the patientsmells a level and detects the odor from the four choices. There is ananswer column on the back of the test booklet, and the test is scoredout of 40 items. The score is compared to scores in a normative databasefrom 4000 normal individuals, which tells the level of absolute smellfunction. The score also indicates how the patient does in accordance totheir age group and gender.

As part of a non-invasive health screening process, and individualseeking entry has a hand-sanitizer sprayed on each of a left-hand 502and a right-hand 504 from separate reservoirs 506 and 508. The reservoir506 has a dispenser 507 that is independently activated to provide aspray to the left-hand 502. Similarly, the reservoir 508 has a dispenser509 that is independently activated to provide a spray to the right hand504. Again, as described hereinabove, this can be done via a touchlessautomated system or by third party entry confirmation individual. Thesamples are labeled A for reservoir 506 and B for reservoir 508.

Once the entrants hands are sprayed, they will be asked to smell bothhands individually and to let the person administering the test theninquire “what do you smell?” or “what scent can you smell on yourhands?” It is important that the individual not rub their hands togetheror mix the two administered sprays. Thus, in one embodiment, thecompound is administered as a spray and, another embodiment, it could bea gel. In the case of the gel, it is important that the individual doesnot rub their hands together. They merely smell the gel before it isrubbed in. This is illustrated in FIG. 7. The individual, under normalhealth conditions, should be able to discern between the smells of theright and left hands and ideally pick up at least one unique smell(added odorant) on the opposite hand. If the individual can correctlyidentify by smell the added odorant, then the screening operation is tobe considered valid and verified and the person is allowed to enter thevenue or facility. If, however, the individual cannot correctly identifyby smell the added odorant, then the screening test is to be consideredto have identified through olfactory screening an individual which “may”have a specific “disease or infection state” and will need to repeat thescreening test.

Once the individual has failed initial screening test, he or she issubjected to an additional screening test utilizing one or more newlyadded odorant-modified hand sanitizers. This odor test enables monitoredself-reporting, used as early identification and isolation ofasymptomatic/pre-symptomatic cases are patients with mild symptoms (whomay not have a fever). In this additional test, the entrants have theirhands again sprayed with two new odorant-modified hand sanitizers andasked to discern between the smells of the two hands and ideally pick uptwo unique smells, but at least one unique smell. This process isillustrated in FIG. 8, wherein two additional reservoirs 802 and 804 areprovided with dispensers 803 and 805, respectively, for spraying on therespective left and right hands 502 and 504. Again, these dispensers 803and 805 can be touchless sprays or third-party activated. It isundesirable for the user to actually touch these dispensers 803 or 805.

Referring now to FIG. 9, there is illustrated a diagrammatic view of anoverall system in one disclosed embodiment. The ticket 207 is utilizedby the individual with that the unique barcode or ID 207′ to gain accessat an entry gate. The ticket 207 and the barcode 207′ are input to ascanner 904 to scan the information there from. The scanner 904 isinterface with a local processor or PC 902, which is operable tointerface with an operator the a display 903 and a keyboard or otherinput device 905. The local PC 903 also interfaces to a central office908 through a cloud network 906 such as the Internet. The central office908 has a database 910 associated there with for storing informationregarding the ticket 207 in association with such things as the venue orevent location, the seat and row location in the venue, the user, thetime and date of purchase, the time and date of actual access grant,etc. This is stored in a relational database. In addition, there isstored in association there with information regarding the particularscreening process which, in this particular disclosed embodiment, is aCOVID 19 screening process. The local PC 902 is operable interface witha gate 912, in some situations, wherein the gate 912 is all likelycontrol to grant or deny access. A touch display 909 is also controlledby the local PC 902 enrolled order to allow interface with theindividual that is desirous of gaining access to the venue or event.

A dispenser 914 is provided which has contained therein a plurality ofreservoirs 916. These are reservoirs 916 contain antiseptic spray or geland an odorant or, in the case of a control, a lack of an odorant. Forexample, five of the reservoirs 916 have odorants associated there with,the outputs labeled S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5, and one of the reservoirs 916labeled Control. The five reservoirs 916 containing odorants are inputto a distribution multiplexer 918 for selective dispensing. Thedispensing multiplexer is operable to select one of the outputs of the 5odorant containing reservoirs 916 for interface with an internal pump oractivation mechanism to allow the selected odorant containing antisepticto be dispensed via an orifice 922. Similarly, the reservoir 916containing the Control is input to a dispenser 920 which can beselectively activated to dispense the contents of the reservoir 916containing no odorant, i.e., the control reservoir, out of an orifice924. Again, as described above, this could be a spray of analcohol-based antiseptic or a gel-based antiseptic which has as a base aglycerin compound. Typically, the antiseptic will be approximately 70%or greater in alcohol content.

It should be understood that the odorant can be contained in a reservoirwith antiseptic as a standalone compound or, alternatively, it could bethat the reservoir contains nearly the odorant and is next with acontrol.

In operation, the individual is instructed to dispose your hands underthe orifices 922 and 924 and, in one embodiment utilizing touchlessdistribution, and can be sensed by a sensor (not shown) and theappropriate pumps activated by the local PC 902. The local PC 902 hascontrol/sense lines 925 associated there with to send control signals tothe dispenser 914 and receives signals from the dispenser 914. When theuser places their hands under the dispenser 914 for touchless orthird-party operator control, the local PC 902 determines which of theodorants are distributed. One aspect of the overall system is that it isimportant that the individual not have a predetermined knowledge of theodorant utilize. For example, they may hear the person in front of themexclaim “that smells like coconut.” Thus, it is important that the sameodorant not be utilized for sequential people.

After the individual has been instructed to smell each hand beforerubbing their hands together, the individual is presented with choiceson the touch display 909. For this operation, and this particulardisclosed display, only a single set of choices is displayed. Thus, allthat is being inquired about is whether they can discern (smell) anyodorant. They will be provided with, for example, 5 selections fromwhich they are to choose. Since the local PC 902 has determine whichodorant is dispensed, it is possible to present the correct choice amongothers. The 5 choices do not necessarily have to represent the 5odorants are available, as it is only necessary that the dispensedodorant is on the set of choices. If an odorant is dispensed to bothhands, to sequential displays of 5 choices can be provided or choicesfor the left-hand and right-hand can be provided.

Additionally, there is provided a multiplexer 930 that will allow thedistribution multiplexer 918 to output odorant-enhanced antiseptic sprayon either the orifice 922 or the orifice 924. Thus, it is possible todispense two odorants in sequence. Additionally, the control can beinterfaced with the distribution multiplexer 918 on the input thereof,such that the control can be dispensed via the distribution multiplexer918. In one operation, before any distribution, both the distributionmultiplexer 918 and the orifice 922 are flushed with the controlantiseptic that has no odorant in there. The reason for this is that itis desirable that what is dispensed does not have odorant from aprevious dispensing operation. Thus, after each operation of thedistribution multiplexer 918, and after the user has removed theirhands, a small amount of control is routed to the input of thedistribution multiplexer 918 for distribution from the orifice 922. Thiswill ensure that the output of the distribution multiplexer 918 and theorifice 922 are devoid of any odorant-enhanced antiseptic compound froma previous distribution or dispensing operation. All of these operationsare controlled and recorded by the local PC 902. They are all linked inthe relational database with the unique ID of the ticket number. Thus,they are effectively link to the actual individual.

In the event that additional test is required wherein twoodorant-enhanced antiseptic compounds are required to be dispensed, oneto each hand, the multiplexer 930 can be operated to distribute oneodorant-enhanced spray to one hand, flush the orifice 922 with controland then distribute a second odorant-enhanced rate to the other hand.Instructions will have to be dispensed to the individual. The orifices922 and 924 can be separated so that both hands can be disposed underthe apparatus or they can be disposed in close association therewith,such that two operations will be required.

Referring now to FIG. 10, there is illustrated a perspective view of anexample of a dispenser 914, which is comprised of a first dispenser 1002and a second dispenser 1004. The first dispenser 1002 is operable todispense the 5 odorant-enhanced antiseptic compounds in the seconddispenser 1004 is operable to dispense the control antiseptic compound.Each of the 5 internal reservoirs (not shown) is associated with adispensing nozzle 1004. The second dispenser 1004 has a singledispensing nozzle 1006 associated there with. These nozzles can be, asdescribed hereinabove, associated with a touchless system or operatorcontrolled by a third-party operator. It could be that the local PC 902actually controls them or that it indicates to the operator which onesto push or that it senses which one the operator actually pushes, suchthat the operator can randomize the selection. However, this systemallows an individual to see which one is being pushed and there is apossibility that someone in the back of line can see which one is pushedand somehow discern what odorant is associated therewith. It is possiblethat there may be a cover over the nozzles 1004 and 1006 such that it isimpossible for a casual observer to determine which one has been pushedor selected. The local PC 902, can make the randomized selectioncompletely unseen by any individual passing through the entry line. Thelocal PC 902 removes any bias that could be injected by a third-partyoperator. For example, the third-party operator could be by thelackadaisical and merely push the same nozzle each time for dispensingof the same odorant-enhanced antiseptic compound each time.Additionally, it is possible that the third-party operator, having someidea as to what odorant is associated with any particular reservoir,could allow friends to pass through, i.e., allow them to pass the testand gain access regardless of their health condition. It may be that anyregulating body would require removal of individual bias with anindependent processor-based system.

Referring to FIG. 11, there is illustrated one example of the detail ofthe dispenser 914. As noted above, there are illustrated fiveodorant-enhanced antiseptic compound reservoirs 1102 in a single controlantiseptic compound reservoir 1104. Each of the owner-enhancedantiseptic compound reservoirs 1102 by interface with a separate andassociated pump 1106 and the control antiseptic compound reservoir 1106is interface with a pump 1108. The reservoirs 1102 and 1104 can bepressurized reservoirs wherein the pumps merely require the depressionof a nozzle to release the pressurized contents or they can be amechanical spray or dispenser mechanism that requires a reciprocatingpump action. These are well-known type of pumping mechanisms however,each of the pumps is activated by the local PC 902 via a control line1126, each controlled independently. Each of the pumps 1106 and 1108 hasthe output thereof interfaced with a manifold 1110, which is equivalentto the distribution multiplexer 918 of FIG. 9. This is operable toselect the output of any one of the pumps 1106-1108 for output thereofto an actuator sense block 1112. The actuator sense block 1112 isassociated only with the output of the pump 1108, whereas the actuatorsense block 1114 is interface with the output of the manifold 1110. Theactuator sense blocks 1112 and 1114 provide feedback via sense lines1128 to the local PC 902 to indicate actuation thereof. The output ofthe actuator sense block 1112 is output to a nozzle 1116, this being thecontrol nozzle and the output of the actuator sense block 1114 is outputto a nozzle 1118, this being usually associated with theodorant-enhanced antiseptic compounds. As described hereinabove, theoverall operation can allow for any one of the odorant-enhancedantiseptic compounds to be output from the nozzle 1118 in addition tothe contents of the control reservoir 1104. This inclusion of thecontrol antiseptic compound thus allows the manifold 1110 and the nozzle1118 to be flushed out with the control antiseptic compound prior todispensing of any odorant-enhanced antiseptic compound. Although notillustrated, it is possible that the output of the manifold 1110 couldbe Interface with the actuator 1112, if it were desirable to have theodorant-enhanced antiseptic compound dispensed from the nozzle 1116.

Referring now to FIG. 12, there is illustrated an alternate embodimentwherein the manifold 1110 has two outputs, one output input to theactuator sense block 1114 and the other output input to the actuatorsense block 1112. All 6 pump outputs from pumps 1106 and 1108 are inputto the manifold 1110, such that manifold 1110 controls distribution tothe respective nozzles 1118 and 1116.

Referring now to FIG. 13, there is illustrated a flowchart for onedisclosed embodiment of the overall operation. The program is initiatedat a block 1302 and then proceeds to a block 1304 wherein the code isscanned from the ticket 207. The program then flows to a function block1306 to initiate the overall access process. This, as described above,is in operation wherein the individual is given certain instruction suchas removing any gloves or the such, and placing their hands underneathcertain nozzles. The program then flows to a decision block 1308 todetermine if the control pump is or has been activated and is ready tobe operated. In this operation, it is possible that the individual isrequired to first place the right hand under the nozzle and then theirleft-hand under the nozzle. However, it could be that both are activatedat the same time. The program then flows to a function block 1310 todetermine if the right pump has been activated, this being for the righthand. The program then flows a decision block 1312 to determine if theleft pump has been activated comes being for the left-hand. Once bothpumps have been activated, the program flows to a function block 1313 inorder to instruct the user how to proceed with smelling their hands. Itcan be an instruction to smell the right hand and then the left-hand orthe opposite. The program then flows to a function block 1314 to displaychoices in a multiple-choice format. This display 909 is basicallyrandomized, such that the correct choice is not always in the samelocation. In this operation, it is possible that the control could bedistributed to either the right or the left hand or it could be that itis not the control antiseptic compound that is dispensed but, rather,two odorant-enhanced antiseptic compounds. The user is instructed in thefunction block 1313 to, after smelling your hands, make a choice on thetouch display 909. Thus, the touch display 909 first displaysinstructions and then displays the choices. It could be that there isfirst displayed a first display for the left-hand and then a seconddisplay for the right hand, or both right hand left-hand choice displayscould be displayed side-by-side at same time. It is noted that providingchoices to the individual of actual odorants for a particular hand whenin fact the control was dispensed actually introduces some controlledair into the system. This is a situation wherein you be seen that is oris not “guessing.” Could be that both choices have a “none” choice. Byhaving that show up randomly on the right or left hand choice, this canfurther validate the overall process.

Referring now to FIG. 14, there is illustrated a flowchart for anactuation process. This is initiated at a block 1402 and then proceedsto a decision block 1404 to determine if the control path is activated.This is to be operated with a touchless system such that the pumps mustfirst be activated or selected. Once the control antiseptic compoundpump is activated or selected, the program flows to a function block1406 wherein the selection of which of the odorant-enhanced antisepticcompounds is to be selected. The program then flows to a function block1408 to select the pump from the resultant random selection. The programthen flows to a function block 1410 to initiate the selectedodorant-enhanced antiseptic compound pump to place it in a “ready”condition. The program then flows to a decision block 1414 to determineif a touchless sensor has been actuated for the overall dispensingoperation. The program then flows to a function block 1416 to activatethe respective pumps, i.e., control antiseptic compound pump and theselected odorant-enhanced antiseptic compound. The program then flows afunction block 1422, after the touchless sensor detects the removal ofthe hands from under the nozzle, to flush the nozzle associated with theodorant-enhanced antiseptic compound pump. The program then flows to aReturn block 1424.

The program then flows to a decision block 1316 to wait for all of thechoices to be made by the individual. Once made, the program flows to adecision block 1318 to determine if these choices are correct. Even iftwo odorant-enhanced antiseptic compounds are dispensed, it may be thatonly one need be detected and the correct choice made. If the correctchoices are not made, the program flows to a function block 1319 inorder to generate an alternate path of decision-making, i.e., subjectthe individual to a different test with different odorants. If correct,the program flows along a “Y” path to a function block 1322 in order toconfirm the correct choice and then to a function block 1324 whereinaccess is granted, i.e., a gate is opened or an attendant is instructedto allow the individual to pass. The program then flows to a Returnblock 1326.

Referring now to FIG. 15, there is illustrated a flowchart for analternate actuation procedure, which is initiated at a block 1502. Theprogram then flows to block 1504 to determine if the control touchlesssensor has been activated. Once activated, the program flows to thefunction block 1506 to activate the control pump and then to a functionblock 1508 to randomize the selection for the odorant-enhancedantiseptic compound pumps and then to a function block 1510 to selectthe selected odorant-enhanced antiseptic compound pump for output. Theprogram then flows to a function block 1512 to initiate the selectedodorant-enhanced antiseptic compound pump and then to a decision block1516 to determine if the touchless sensor for the odorant-enhancedantiseptic compound has been activated, i.e., the individual has placedtheir hand under the nozzle at the appropriate time. The program thenflows to a function block 1518 to activate the selected odorant-enhancedantiseptic compound pump and then to decision block 1520 to determinewhen the operation is complete. This means that the individual has firstplaced their hand under the nozzle in a first operation to receive thedispensed control antiseptic compound and then the other hand under thesame nozzle in a second operation to receive the dispensedodorant-enhanced antiseptic compound. Once the touchless sensorindicates that the hands have been removed from proximity to the novel,the operation is complete. The program then flows to a function block1522 to flush the nozzle with the control antiseptic compound. Theprogram then flows to a Return block 1524.

Referring now to FIG. 16, there is illustrated a flowchart depicting ahigher level view of the overall operation, which is initiated at ablock 1602. The program then flows to a function block 1604 in order toscan the code on the ticket 207. The program then flows to a decisionblock 1602 to determine if the scan code has been accepted by thesystem, i.e., it has been validated as an authorized ticket code forthat particular venue or event. If not, the program flows along a “N”path to a function block 1610 to take administrative action. Onceaccepted, the program flows to a function block 1612 wherein one hand isplaced under the control spray. The program then flows to a functionblock 1614 where the individual smells that hand. The program then flowsto a function block 1616 to place the other hand under theodorant-enhanced antiseptic compound spray nozzle, noting that thesecould be the same nozzles. The program then flows to a function block1618 wherein the individual is instructed to smell that hand. Theprogram then flows to a function block 1620 wherein the individual viewsthe display and into a function block 1622 to select the best match fromthe multiple-choice presentation. The program then flows to a Done block1624. In this overall operation, the individual knows that one hand is acontrol hand and is important to smell at hand first and then smell thehand having the odorant associated there with.

Referring now to FIG. 17, there illustrated two sequential displays thatare presented to two different individuals. It can be seen that theupper box represents a first instance of time wherein a displaysprovider for the left-hand and the right-hand. It could be that eitherof these hand has been associated with a dispensed control antisepticcompound or both have been associated with a dispensed odorant-enhancedantiseptic compound. Even though only, in one example, there are 5available odorant-hands in a septic compounds, they can be that otherodorants are displayed. It can be seen in the bottom pane, for the nextdisplay that different choices are present. These are randomize suchthat, for example, if a coconut scent were dispensed, it would appear atdifferent positions.

Referring now to FIG. 18, there is displayed the layout of a relationaldatabase. This relational database is all keyed to the ID, i.e., theunique barcode number on the ticket 207. There are provided columns asto what scent was dispensed in the control nozzle and the scent nozzle.And his example, only one nozzle was associated with odorant-enhancedantiseptic compound and the other associated with a control antisepticcompound. However, it could be that the control nozzle could have hadodorant-enhanced antiseptic compound dispensed therefrom. There is aResult column indicating whether the particular ID was associated with acorrect result, i.e., did they indicate the correct scent. There is alsoa date and time column indicating when the particular test was carriedout.

Referring now to FIG. 19, there is illustrated the diagrammatic view ofan alternate antiseptic compound dispenser 1903, wherein there isprovided a single outlet 1916 for multiple nozzles 1910. There arecontained within the dispenser 1903 a plurality of reservoirs 1902, eachcontaining either a control antiseptic compound or odorant-enhancedantiseptic compounds. Each of these reservoirs 1902 has a pump 1904associated there with, which is controlled by a control block 1920, thiscontrol box 1920 associated with the local PC 902. There is provided atouchless sensor 1908 they sense line 1922 that goes back to the controlblock 1920. Thus, by the individual holding their hand under the outlet1916 and it being sensed by the touchless sensor 1908, any one of thepumps 1904 can be activated, depending upon the sequence describedhereinabove. A detail of the nozzles 1910 as they are disposed in theoutlet 1916 is illustrated FIG. 20. It can be seen that these nozzles1910 are clustered in a group. It may be that the center most nozzle1910 is associated with the control antiseptic compound. The individualdispenser 1908 including a single outlet 1916 may be used for theself-testing process described below.

The issues associated with a lack of smell may also be tested usingself-test systems for identifying diseases such as COVID 19 for apatient or controlling access to various types of locations through acontrolled portal. Smell disfunction can be used as an indication of awide variety of disease states. While most common causes of smelldisturbance relate to nasal or sinus diseases, upper respiratoryinfections and head traumas, frequent causes of smell disturbanceinclude oral infections, oral appliances, dental procedures and Bell'sPalsy. Medications can interfere with a smell and taste and should bereviewed in all patients reporting a nasal dysfunction. Convincingevidence indicates that olfaction is impaired in a variety ofneurodegenerative disorders. Examples of these common diseases includeParkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia with Lewy bodies.Olfaction is lost in the majority of the patients affected by theseconditions.

Referring now to FIG. 21, there is illustrated a manner for providing astaged approach to enable individuals to self-test their sense of smelland be scored for accuracy. An individual receives a set of staged smelltests 2102 that provide multiple tests in a staged sequence with respectto the individual's ability to smell certain fragrances as describedabove. Each of the tests are associated with a unique subject identifier2104 that associates a particular test with a specific individual. Theresults of each of the staged tests are provided to a test result inputdevice 2106 to record the user's reaction to a particular smell. Thetest result input device 2106 may comprise a mobile device applicationor interactive display associated with the test dispenser that enables auser to enter answer questions regarding the smell detected when takingthe smell test using either touchscreen displays or voice recognitiontechnologies. The test result input device 2106 may comprise anyapparatus capable of noting a subject's answers to the test be taken.

The test results are stored within a relational database 2108. Thedatabase 2108 comprises a relational database that associates the testresults for each of the staged tests with the provided subjectidentifier 2104 associated with the individual taking the test. The testresults stored within the test results database 2108 are provided to atest results analyzer 2110. The test results analyzer 2110 determines ascore associated with the individual taking the test based upon whetherthe correct smells have been detected using the staged test results.Based upon the test results, an individual score can be manually orelectronically computed to determine a real time screen of a variety ofpossible disease states. The analyzer 2110 provides a subject scoreresult 2112 based upon the results of the tests. The subject's result2112 can be used by the individual or an entity conducting the chemosensory disorder test in order to direct the individual to additionaltesting services or options. The entity testing the individual can usethe result as a possible indicator that the tested individual may infector expose other individuals within the immediate vicinity and approve ordeny access to particular locations. The subject score result 2112 isused to control the subject 2114 in a desired manner. The score 2112 maybe used to direct individuals to other locations, direct individuals tomedical authorities, direct individuals to self-quarantine and to directindividuals to have additional health screening tests performed.

Referring now to FIG. 22, there is illustrated a flow diagram of theprocess for providing staged self-testing of individuals to detect lossof sense of a smell. Initially, an individual desiring to be self-testedprovides at step 2202 a unique subject identifier at a scanning station.The identifier may comprise a barcode, QR code, magnetic card stripe,chip identifier, or any other means for uniquely identifying anindividual. The codes may for example be placed upon tickets or othercoupons used for accessing a particular venue. The magnetic card stripesor chip identifiers may be utilized on drivers licenses, student IDs,work IDs or any other type of card or badge necessary to enable anindividual access to a particular area or to identify the individual ina unique fashion. Once the subject identifier has been provided at step2202, the test is dispensed at step 2204. The dispensed test may be theapplication of a spray or gel onto the hand or hands of a user as moreparticularly described hereinabove particularly with respect to FIG. 19.Additionally, the dispenser could dispense packets including a cloth orwipe therein that provides a fragrance for testing the individual'ssense of smell. It should be realized by one skilled in the art that anymanner for providing a fragrance for smelling by a test subject may beutilized. Next, the test is administered by the individual at step 2206.Administration of the test requires the individual to smell thefragrance provided by the spray, gel, cloth, etc. and enter anindication of the smell that they detected through an associated displayinterface or mobile device application interface associated with theself-testing process.

The results of the test are stored in a relational database at step2208. The stored test results are used for the creation of a combinedtest score at step 2210. The combined test store utilizes each of thestaged tests that have been conducted thus far to provide a combinedscore based on each of the provided test. Thus, if only a single testhas currently been provided, the combined score would comprise theresults of that single test. If multiple tests have been conducted thenwhether or not the user had passed or failed a predetermined number ofsmell test is used for determining the combined score. Inquiry step 2212determines if there are further tests to be conducted in the staged testprocess. If so, the next test that is different from previously providedtests is dispensed at step 2214. The dispensing of the test would occurin a similar manner to that occurring in step 2204 and may comprisespraying or squirting a spray or gel onto the hands of the user asdescribed more fully hereinabove or utilizing a cloth or other materialhaving a fragrance embedded therein within a provided packet. If inquirystep 2212 determines that no further tests are to be utilized, controlpasses to the screening process 2216 for determination on treatment ofthe individual based upon the combined test score. Screening may involveallowing or not allowing entry of an individual into a particularlocation, designating the individual for further screenings, directingthe individual to medical professionals for further screenings, ordirecting the individuals to self-quarantine.

Referring now to FIG. 23, there is more particularly illustrated theprocess for generating the combined score of step 2210 discussed above.A first test result is received at step 2302. The received test resultis used to compute a combined score at step 2304. The computation of thecombined score will be based upon the number of test results that havebeen currently receive. Thus, if only the first test result has beenreceived, the combined score is based upon one test result. Subsequentto the first test result, the combined score will be updated based uponthe results received from subsequent test results as will be describedherein below. Inquiry step 2306 determines if the final test result hasbeen received from the stage testing process. If not, control passes tostep 2308 and the next test result is received. Control passes back tostep 2304 to determine the new combined score based upon the newlyreceived test result. Once all of the test results have been received afinal combined score is output based upon the previously computedcombined score and the new result at step 2310. This final combinedscore may be used for enabling access to a facility or directing thesubject to further testing protocols as described hereinabove.

While many of the discussions hereinabove have been made with respect toutilizing smell test to detect the potential presence of the COVID 19virus, as further mentioned various types of smell tests may be used asa chemo sensory disorder test for any number of potential issues. Thechemosensory disorder test may be offered in a variety of forms. Theseinclude the multi-dispenser or single dispenser controlled systemdescribed hereinabove with respect to providing access to a ticketedvenue, individual color-coded packages, individual machine-readablecoded packages, individual mechanical sprays, individual manuallyapplied lotions or liquids, individual “scent embedded” media such aspaper products and individually inhaled olfaction dispensers. Any or allof these various techniques may be used to administer a test to anindividual.

Referring now more particularly to FIG. 24, if a packet test is used fordetecting an individual sense of smell, the packets can be coded in avariety of fashions that enable the system to know the particular smellassociated with the packet without providing the test-taker any hint asto the smell associated with the packet. Individual packages would allowfor each scent to be visually identified as the “scent markers” withinthe packets by means of a particular business logo 2402, a machinereadable QR code 2404 or a machine-readable barcode 2406. Other types ofpackages identifiers include letter indications 2408, symbol indications2412, number indications 2414 and color indications 2416. Each of theparticular coded indications are associated with a particular smell.Thus, a coconut smell could be associated with the color blue, numbereight, a checkmark symbol, the letter “A” or a bar or QR code. Thus,when the test results with respect to the particular packet wereentered, the user would enter the particular code on the face of thepacket and then indicate what smell they detected. The testing systemwould record whether the subject had accurately indicated the smellassociated with the entered packet code. The packaging code upon thepackets would have no visible means of identifying the smell containedtherein. For example, a lemon smell would not be included in a packetwith a yellow color code on the packet. Alternatively, the packets couldinclude a combination of unique symbols, brand IDs, alphabeticindicators and numeric indicator combinations to provide the unique testcode indication. The codes could also include unique symbologyassociated with the specific place where the test are being administeredsuch as sports teams, sports leagues, players and the like.

As discussed previously, the manner for administering the smell testfragrance in addition to using the above described packets may utilizethe multi-fragrance dispenser within a sanitizer such as that describedhereinabove with respect to FIG. 19. Alternatively, the system coulddispense individual packets providing a predetermined smell. Referringnow to FIG. 25, there are illustrated the various testing mediums andinto which fragrances may be embedded to provide the chemosensorydisorder testing to test subjects. Testing mediums include a lotion2502, a cream 2504, a squirtable media 2506, a whipped media 2508,individual wipes 2510, oil-based media 2512, water or alcohol-basedmedia 2514 and gel based media 2516. The chemosensory disorder testingmedium provides a dual function when providing the testing fragrancecombined with a hand sanitizer.

Hand sanitizer, also called hand antiseptic, or hand rub comprises anagent applied to the hands for the purpose of removing common pathogens(disease-causing organisms). Hand sanitizers typically come in gel orliquid form. The use of hand sanitizer is recommended when soap andwater are not available for handwashing or when repeated handwashingcompromises the natural skin barrier (e.g., causing scaling or fishersto develop in the skin). Depending on the active ingredient used, handsanitizers can be classified as one of two types: alcohol-based oralcohol free. Alcohol-based products typically contain between 60-95%alcohol, usually in the form of ethanol, isopropanol or n-propanol.

Referring now to FIG. 26 there are illustrated many different types ofpackaging which may be utilized for containing the testing medium. Theseinclude individual disposable plastic packets 2602, fragrancemulticolored infused disks 2604, individual packets including peel offlids 2608, multicolored small pump bottles 2610, individual packets 2612and multicolored spray bottles 2614. Any packaging that may contain afragrance infused medium may be utilized to enable application of themedium to a user or presentation of the fragrance associated with themedium to a test subject's nose. The packaging may also be color codedto indicate the particular fragrance that is being dispensed by thepackaged unit.

Referring now to FIGS. 27 and 28 there are provided block diagrams ofsystems for enabling an individual to self-test using chemosensorydisorder testing technology in order to determine if additionalprocesses with respect to the individual are necessary. Individuals maybe manually sprayed, tested and the test results recorded via a humaninterface and interaction. Interactions may also be digitally managed asshown in FIGS. 27 and 28 with both spray and testing utilizingtouchscreens, electronic dispensers, tablets and mobile devices.Individuals can walk up to staged dispensers and self test and reportwhat they smell on an item basis to provide a self-testing process.

FIG. 27 illustrates a system that utilizes packets for the self-testingprocess. A scanner 2702 scans an identifier 2704 that is associated witha particular user or item. The identifier can be barcodes on a ticket orcoupon possessed by an individual or may be some type of identificationincluding a magnetic strip or chip included on a license, ID card,credit card etc. that is specific to a particular individual. A furtheridentifier may also be provided by the particular testing station thatis providing the test to the user. This testing station identifier canalso be associated with the test results and stored in the database asdescribed below. The scanner 2702 can also scan identifiers associatedwith a particular packet group 2706. The identifiers associated with thepacket group 2706 may comprise any of the bar codes, QR codes, colors,numeric identifiers, alphabetic identifiers, etc. that were discussedpreviously. The scanner 2702 may be associated with a mobile device 2706such as a mobile telephone, tablet, laptop computer, etc. that includesthe processing capabilities necessary for performing the chemosensorydisorder testing functionalities. An application 2708 enables the mobiledevice 2706 to communicate information regarding the test identifier ofthe packet group 2706 and the individual identifier 2704 to a centralcontroller 2710 over a network such as the Internet 2712. The centralcontroller 2710 stores the self-test information within a relationaldatabase 2714 where the test result information is stored with respectto the identifier 2704 for the individual taking the test.

Thus, upon accessing the self-testing system an individual utilizestheir mobile device 2706 to scan the identifier 2704 on a ticket orother identifier associated with the individual. The individual selectsa packet 2706 for testing and smell the material within the packet inorder to take the test. The individual scans the identifier associatedwith the packet 2706 and enters information through an application 2708within the mobile device 2706 indicating the smell detected by theindividual from the material in the packet. The results of this testresult entered by the user is transmitted from the mobile device 2706 tothe central controller 2710 over the network such as the Internet 2712.Finally, the test result information is stored within the relationaldatabase 2714 with respect to the individual identifier 2704 that wasprovided.

Referring now to FIG. 28, there is illustrated an alternative embodimentof a system for providing a chemosensory disorder test using anautomatic dispenser 2802 rather than packets. The automatic dispenser2802 includes a network interface 2804 that enables the automaticdispenser 2802 to communicate with a central controller 2806 over anetwork of 2808 such as the Internet. The automatic dispenser 2802 maycomprise for example the configuration described herein above fordispensing a spray onto the hand of the user in FIG. 19. The dispenser2802 could dispense a single or multiple fragrances onto the hands ofthe user in accordance with the techniques described above. Theautomatic dispenser 2802 also includes Bluetooth circuitry 2810 enablingcommunications with mobile devices 2812 over a Bluetooth communicationslink 2814. The mobile device 2824 includes a mobile application 2816thereon enabling the entry of information that can be provided to thecentral controller 2806 over a communications link through the Internet2808. The application 2816 is used to provide the user identifier, thetest identifiers associated with the test provided by the automaticdispenser 2802, and receive the test results entered by the userresponsive to smelling a fragrance dispensed by the automatic dispenser2802. These test results are transmitted from the mobile device 2812 tothe central controller 2806 over the Internet network 2808 and storedwithin a relational database 2818 such that the test results areassociated with a particular identifier associated with the userproviding the test results.

When utilizing the system of FIG. 28, an individual utilizes theirmobile device 2812 to start the app 2816 and provide a user specificidentifier. The app 2816 requests that the automatic dispenser 2802dispense a scent for testing and provides this request to the centralcontroller 2806. The central controller 2806 controls the automaticdispenser 2802 to dispense a particular fragrance that the user wouldsmell. The user identifies the detected smell through the app 2816 ontheir mobile device 2812 from multiple choices and this test result areforwarded back to the central controller 2806 for storage within therelational database 2816. The central controller 2816 is able toindicate whether the appropriate smell was detected since the centralcontroller 2806 controls the particular scent that was dispensed by theautomatic dispenser 2802. The central controller 2806 stores the testresult indicating whether the user had passed or failed within therelational database 2816 associated with the identifier for the user.

The testing process for performing a user self-test of a chemosensorydisorder is further illustrated in FIG. 29. FIG. 29 illustrates anautomatic dispenser 2902 having an associated entry display 2904. Theentry display 2904 allows an individual being tested to enter theirresponses to fragrances detected by the individual that have beendispensed by the automatic dispenser 2902. The aromatic dispenser 2902may have a similar configuration to those described herein above fordispensing a known scent within a hand sanitizer or other dispensablematerial that is under the control of the dispenser 2902 responsive toinstructions received from a controller 2906. The controller 2906controls the operation of the automatic dispenser 2902 and enables theoutputting of known fragrances that may be compared with the responsesentered by the user through the entry display 2904 in order to determinewhether an individual has passed or failed the chemosensory disordertest. The results of the test along with an identifier associated withthe user that has been entered through the entry display 2904 are storedin a relational database 2908. The database 2908 includes an indicationof the identifier of the particular user and the result of the test ortests that are associated with the user.

Referring now also to FIG. 30A, there is illustrated a user self-teststation wherein packets are used for the testing process rather than theautomatic dispenser such as that described above. This configurationalso includes a controller 3002 that receives inputs from an entrydisplay 3004. However, rather than controlling an automatic dispenser,the controller 3002 is integrated with a scanner 3006. The scanner 3006would scan a code associated with a test that is included on the face ofa packet containing the fragrance used for the test. Thus, an individualwould select a packet from a bin associated with the self-testingstation and hold the printed code on the packet up to a scanningmechanism. Various types of codes can be used as described hereinabove.The scanner 3006 what identify the code and provide this information tothe controller 3002 such that the controller was aware of the test beingprovided. The controller 3002 compares the expected test result with thetest response entered by the user via the entry display 3004. Thecontroller 3002 stores the test result within a database 3008 at alocation associated with a unique user identifier that has also beenprovided either via the entry display 3004 or the scanner 3006.

FIG. 30B more particularly illustrates an embodiment of the systemwherein rather than packets being drawn by the individual and scannedare automatically dispensed under the control of the central controller3020 through a controlled feed mechanism 3022. The central controller3020 provides control signals via control line 3024 to an access controlmechanism 3026 to provide a single known packet to the individual beingtested response to receiving a request to a self-test from anapplication on a mobile device or other actuation mechanism. A series ofbins 3028 are provided wherein each of the bins contains a separategroup of packets containing a single fragrance. When the access controlmechanism 3026 receives a signal via the control line 3024, a singlepacket is dispensed from the associated bin 3028. The dispensed packetthen travels down a chute 3030 to be dispensed to the user at an outlet3032. The user will open the packet and utilize the wipe or clothcontained therein to attempt to detect the smell and provide anindication of the smell they detected through the entry display 3034.This result is provided back to the controller 3020 and entered into therelational database 3036.

The individual chemosensory disorder testing stations may also be strungtogether in a sequential manner such as a line in order to provide astaged testing of individuals within the line as illustrated in FIG. 31.Each of the testing stations be they manual or digital can be stagedalong waiting lines or social distancing paths with each stationproviding a different code to be recognized for results storagepurposes. The testing stations are coded in the same manner asindividual packets are coded. If the individual packets are provided,the packets could just be grab bag or luck of the draw as long as theindividual test two or more scents correctly. The staged testing systemwould include a plurality of testing stations 3102 that are locatedalong a line or social distancing path. Each of the testing stations3102 communicate with a central controller 3104 that controls theoperations of each of the testing stations as described above. Thecentral controller 3104 is connected with a relational database 3106that stores the test results received from the testing stations 3102.These test results would be associated with a particular individualidentifier such that an individual may generate test results at each ofthe testing stations 3102 and have the separate results associatedtogether for a final determination of the individual status by thecontroller 3104.

Each of the testing stations 3102 includes a spray station or packet bin3108 for dispensing the tests under the control of the centralcontroller 3104. The spray station or packet bin 3108 may be configuredin a manner similar to that discussed above with respect to theprovision of the test for allowing entry to a venue. Alternatively, thecentral controller 3104 may cause the testing station 3102 to dispense aparticular known packet having a known fragrance associated with thepacket. Since the fragrance of the dispensed packet is known the testresult may be determined by the controller 3104 responsive to the testresponse given through a display 3110. Alternatively, rather thandispensing a packet having a known fragrance, a user could merelyrandomly select a packet from an associated packet bin and then scan acode on the face of the packet wherein the code identifies the fragranceassociated with the packet to the central controller 3104 in a mannersimilar to that described above using an associated scanner 3112.

The scanner 3112 is used for scanning a bar or QR code associated with aticket or document possessed by an individual or could comprise magneticor chip card readers for reading a magnetic strip or chip embedded upona drivers license or other type of ID associated with the individual.Additionally, the scanner 3112 scans codes located on the face of apacket that is selected from the system in order to notify thecontroller 3104 of the scent associated with the packet withoutproviding this information to the individual being tested. The display3110 displays various options for the user to select the scent theydetected within the scent provided to them. The central controller 3104controls the display 3110 to display, for example, four differentselections wherein only one of the selections accurately identifies theprovided scent. The relational database 3106 will store each of the testresults received from the individual testing stations 3102. Each testresult will be associated with a particular test identifying the smellassociated with the test and a unique identifier associated with theindividual taking the test.

While FIG. 31 has described that each of the testing stations 3102 arelocated along a line or social distancing path, the testing stationscould also be separated in time from each other. Thus, in order tomaintain the validity of an access pass of an individual to, forexample, access buildings on a college campus, the test subject wouldperiodically have to go to a testing station and test their sense ofsmell with one or more tests as described above. After completion of asuccessful test, the access pass would be validity for an additionalperiod of time (hours, days, etc.).

Referring now to FIG. 32 there is illustrated a flow diagram of theprocess for performing staged testing of individuals in a line or socialdistancing path. When an individual arrives at a first testing station3102, the testing station receives the user identifier at step 3202using for example a scanner 3112 as described previously. Upon receiptof an identifier associated with the test subject, the system willeither actuate a spray dispenser using for example a similar system tothat described hereinabove with respect to FIG. 19 and others oralternatively, scan a packet ID associated with a testing packet at step3204. The system will receive the first test result at step 3206involving the user providing an entry responsive to the scent providedto them through a display 3110 responsive to the scent provided to themand transmission and storage of the user selection of the test resultwithin the relational database 3106 through the controller 3104. Theindividual next proceeds to a next testing station 3102 and again enterstheir identifier at the next testing station at step 3208. Responsive toreceipt of an identifier, the system activates at step 3210 a dispenserto dispense a scent medium or alternatively scan a packet ID associatedwith a packet selected by the test subject. The results are entered intothe system and received at step 3212 where the user selects a smelledscent using an associated display 3110 providing multiple resultselections, and the test result is stored in relational database 3106associated with the central controller 104. When multiple test resultshave been received, a combined result score generated at step 3214. Thecombined result score is based upon multiple tests performed on theindividual passing through the line. Inquiry step 3216 determineswhether or not the user has passed the multiple tests taken by theindividual test subject. If so, control passes to inquiry step 3218 anda determination is made if more testing is needed or available for theindividual. If no further testing is available, the individual is sentthrough path one processing at step 3220 wherein the user would likelybe admitted to the location or receive an indication as passing the testsince the combined score indicated a passing condition. If more testsare available as determined at inquiry step 3218, control passes back tostep 3208 to receive an identifier at the next testing station. Ifinquiry step 3216 determines from the combined score that the individualhas not passed, the test control passes to the path two processing 3222wherein the user may be denied entry to a facility or required to takefurther screening processes possibly with medical staff in order to beallowed into the facility or determine whether the failure of the smelltest is indicating a particular problem. The path two processing 3222could also involve the issuance of an approval certificate that wouldallow an individual access to one or more facilities/locations. Theapproval certificate could comprise some time of physical certificatedispensed by the system, an indication coded onto a ID associated withthe individual or updating a database entry associated with theindividual to indicate that they are allowed access.

Referring now to FIG. 33, there is illustrated a more detailedillustration of the test controller 3302 and relational database 3304for providing staged test results for an individual. The test controller3302 comprises a server/processor receiving the test results frommultiple locations such as the controller 3104 illustrated in FIG. 31 orcould comprise a mobile application implemented on a mobile device,tablet pad, etc. The test controller 3302 includes a database interface3306 enabling the test controller 3302 to communicate with therelational database 3304. A network interface 3308 enables the testcontroller 3302 to communicate either with a wired or wireless network.This allows the test controller 3302 to receive communications such astest results from one of the testing stations 3102 or transmittinginstructions to dispensers 3108 to control the dispensation of aparticular scent/fragrance for testing an individual scent. The combinedscore controller 3310 takes multiple individual test results providedeither through the network interface 3308 from various testing sites orthrough the network interface and from previously stored test results3312 stored within the relational database 3304. The combined scorecontroller 3310 computes a combined score based upon each of the testsindicating whether the user has passed or failed or whether or not thetested individual needs to go for further screening or medical attentionor if they may be admitted to a particular venue. The decision on how totreat an individual based upon their combined score from the combinedscore controller 3310 is made by the access decision controller 3314.The access decision controller 3314 will be programmed according to aset of predetermined parameters that establishes what indicates a passedtest and what indicates a failed test. For example, if four tests weretaken, a pass indication could be established based upon three or morepositive test results. However, if only a single or no passing testresults were received, the testing individual would fail. An indicationof two passed and two fail test result could provide an indication ofneed for further testing to reach a final decision. Any particularpredetermined testing criteria may be established based upon the needsor desires of the particular testing facility or testing station. Thebasis on which an individual is determined to pass or fail can bedynamically adjusted by the access decision controller such that basedon changing conditions or changing factors based on previous testresults of the individual the pass/fail criteria can be dynamicallychanged.

The relational database 3304 stores multiple test results 3312 withrespect to various tested individuals. These test results can indicate atest pass (TP) result or a test fail (TF) test result. These resultswould vary according to the particular individual being tested. Each ofthe test results 3312 have two specific identifiers associatedtherewith. The first is the unique ID 3316 associated with eachindividual being tested. In the example in FIG. 33 there are indicatedSub 1, Sub 2 and Sub 3. Each of these would have a unique identifierassociated where there with such that each test within the row ofsubscriber 1 is associated with subscriber 1. Each test in the row ofsubscriber 2 is associated with subscriber 2 and so forth. In additionto being associated with the individual identifier, each test 3312 alsohas associated there with a testing identifier unique to the specifictest. This identifier would indicate the original fragrance associatedwith the test either dispensed by the system using an automaticdispensing system or selected by the user if a selected packet systemwere used. The test identifier would also identify with the test resultindicating whether the individual had passed or failed the test. Thus,each test result would have at least two identifiers associated therewith for monitoring and determining test results.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art having the benefit ofthis disclosure that this chemosensory disorder trigger and managementsystem provides a method and system for performing chemosensory disordertesting provides an improved method and system for detectingchemosensory disorder. It should be understood that the drawings anddetailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative ratherthan a restrictive manner, and are not intended to be limiting to theparticular forms and examples disclosed. On the contrary, included areany further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions,alternatives, design choices, and embodiments apparent to those ofordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scopehereof, as defined by the following claims. Thus, it is intended thatthe following claims be interpreted to embrace all such furthermodifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives,design choices, and embodiments.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for chemosensory disorder testing,comprising: a scanner for scanning a unique identifier associated with atest subject; a scent dispensing unit for dispensing a predeterminedscent for the test subject responsive to receipt of a dispensing controlsignal; a user interface for receiving a test response input from thetest subject based on a perception of the test subject of thepredetermined scent dispensed by the scent dispensing unit; a centralcontroller for generating the dispensing control signal responsive tothe unique identifier scanned by the scanner, the central controllerfurther determining at least one of a pass test result or a fail testresult responsive to a comparison of the test response input to apredetermined response associated with the predetermined scent; and arelational database for storing the pass test result or the fail testresult at a location associated with the unique identifier associatedwith the test subject.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the scentdispensing unit further comprises a spraying unit, the spraying unitcomprising: a plurality of reservoirs each containing a separate scentof a plurality of scents; a pumping mechanism for dispensing thepredetermined scent from a selected one of the plurality of reservoirs,the pumping mechanism responsive to the dispensing control signal fordispensing the predetermined scent from one of the plurality ofreservoirs; and at least one nozzle for dispensing the predeterminedscent from the pumping mechanism.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein thepumping mechanism comprises a plurality of pumps each of the pluralityof pumps connected between one of the plurality of reservoirs and the atleast one nozzle.
 4. The system of claim 2, wherein the pumpingmechanism comprises: a manifold connected between each of the pluralityof reservoirs and the at least one nozzle, the manifold obtaining thepredetermined scent from one of the plurality of reservoirs responsiveto the dispensing control signal; and an actuator for dispensing thepredetermined scent from the manifold to the at least one nozzle.
 5. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the scent dispensing unit comprises: aplurality of bins each containing a plurality of packets, each of theplurality of bins containing a same group of packets having a particularscent of a plurality of scents; and a packet dispensing mechanism fordispensing a packet from a particular bin of the plurality of bins anddispensing the packet to the test subject.
 6. The system of claim 1,wherein the relational database stores each of the pass test results orthe fail test results in association with the unique identifier of thetest subject and a second unique identifier associated with thepredetermined scent.
 7. The system of claim 1 further comprising anapplication implemented on a portable user device for implementing theuser interface for receiving the test response input from the testsubject.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the central controllerfurther receives multiple pass/fail test results and determines acombined pass/fail test result based on the multiple pass/fail testresults.
 9. A system for chemosensory disorder testing, comprising: aplurality of testing stations for testing for a chemosensory disorderwithin at least one test subject and controlling access to a location,each of the plurality of testing stations further comprising: a scannerfor scanning a unique identifier associated with a test subject; a scentdispensing unit for dispensing a predetermined scent for the testsubject responsive to receipt of a dispensing control signal; a userinterface for receiving a test response input from the test subjectbased on a perception of the test subject of the predetermined scentdispensed by the scent dispensing unit; a central controller forgenerating the dispensing control signal responsive to the uniqueidentifier scanned by the scanner, the central controller furtherdetermining at least one of a pass test result or a fail test resultresponsive to a comparison of the test response input to a predeterminedresponse associated with the predetermined scent, the central controllerfurther receiving multiple pass/fail test results and determining acombined pass/fail test result for the at least one test subject basedon the multiple pass/fail test results and determining whether to denyaccess to the location responsive to the combined pass/fail test result;and a relational database for storing the pass test result or the failtest result at a storage location associated with the unique identifierassociated with the test subject.
 10. The system of claim 9, wherein thescent dispensing unit for each of the plurality of testing stationsfurther comprises a spraying unit, the spraying unit comprising: aplurality of reservoirs each containing a separate scent of a pluralityof scents; a pumping mechanism for dispensing the predetermined scentfrom a selected one of the plurality of reservoirs, the pumpingmechanism responsive to the dispensing control signal for dispensing thepredetermined scent from one of the plurality of reservoirs; and atleast one nozzle for dispensing the predetermined scent from the pumpingmechanism.
 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the pumping mechanismcomprises a plurality of pumps each of the plurality of pumps connectedbetween one of the plurality of reservoirs and the at least one nozzle.12. The system of claim 10, wherein the pumping mechanism comprises: amanifold connected between each of the plurality of reservoirs and theat least one nozzle, the manifold obtaining the predetermined scent fromone of the plurality of reservoirs responsive to the dispensing controlsignal; and an actuator for dispensing the predetermined scent from themanifold to the at least one nozzle.
 13. The system of claim 9, whereinthe scent dispensing unit comprises: a plurality of bins each containinga plurality of packets, each of the plurality of bins containing a samegroup of packets having a particular scent of a plurality of scents; anda packet dispensing mechanism for dispending a packet from a particularbin of the plurality of bins and dispensing the packet to the at leastone test subject.
 14. The system of claim 9, wherein the relationaldatabase stores each of the pass test results or the fail test resultsin association with the unique identifier of the at least one testsubject and a second unique identifier associated with the predeterminedscent.
 15. The system of claim 9 further comprising an applicationimplemented on a portable user device for implementing the userinterface for receiving the test response input from the at least onetest subject.
 16. A method for chemosensory disorder testing,comprising: scanning a unique identifier associated with a test subjectusing a scanner; generating a dispensing control signal from a centralcontroller responsive to the unique identifier scanned by the scanner atthe central controller; dispensing a predetermined scent for the testsubject responsive to receipt of the dispensing control signal from ascent dispenser unit; receiving a test response input from the testsubject at a user interface based on a perception of the test subject ofthe predetermined scent dispensed by the scent dispenser unit;determining at least one of a pass test result or a fail test resultresponsive to a comparison of the test response input to a predeterminedresponse associated with the predetermined scent at the centralcontroller; and storing the pass test result or the fail test result ata location associated with the unique identifier associated with thetest subject within a relation database.
 17. The method of claim 16,wherein the step of dispensing further comprises: storing a plurality ofscents in a plurality of reservoirs each reservoir containing a separatescent of the plurality of scents; and dispensing the predetermined scentfrom a selected one of the plurality of reservoirs responsive to thedispensing control signal using a dispensing mechanism.
 18. The methodof claim 16, wherein the scent dispenser unit comprises: storing aplurality of packets in a plurality of associated bins, each of theplurality of associated bins containing a group of packets having aparticular scent of a plurality of scents; dispensing a packet from aparticular bin of the plurality of associated bins using a packetselector mechanism; and dispensing the packet to the test subject. 19.The method of claim 16, wherein the step of storing further comprisesstoring each of the pass test results or the fail test results inassociation with the unique identifier of the test subject and a secondunique identifier associated with the predetermined scent.
 20. Themethod of claim 16 further comprising implementing the user interfacefor receiving the test response input from the test subject using anapplication on a portable user device.
 21. The method of claim 16,further comprising: receiving multiple pass/fail test results; anddetermines a combined pass/fail test result based on the multiplepass/fail test results.